Three-dimensional (3D) printing refers to all the processes used to generate a product by superim- posing layers of material based on a 3-dimensional digital model. The term “3D printing” is most commonly used in the “general public” field, whereas the term “Additive Manufacturing (AF)” is most commonly used by professionals, i.e. in industrial applications.

This manufacturing process differs greatly from the usual techniques for producing parts. Additive manufacturing proceeds by adding material while machining proceeds by removing material. Therefore, no specific tool is required for 3D printing (cutting tool or mould, for example).

3D printing can be classified into three different processes. Whichever process is used, the principle is always the same. Firstly, designing a 3D digital model of the part and then transmitting the instructions in machine language (G code) to the printer, which then creates the part by adding layers of material.

These three categories of processes are:


Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) or Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is a technique of depositing a molten thermoplastic material layer by layer. As the material solidifies, it gives shape to the part.
Originally the material used was only plastics, but progress has made it possible for 3D printing to produce filaments in composite materials based on metal (copper and copper alloy), carbon fibres or even wood.


A Stereolithography Apparatus (SLA), solidifies a photosensitive liquid polymer (which can be called “photopolymer”) using an ultraviolet laser beam. SLA printers consist of a reservoir of liquid photopolymer, a perforated platform, an ultraviolet emitter and a computer.

Upon contact with ultraviolet light, the polymer cures instantly, the first layer is applied, the platform is lowered and the production of the second layer can begin. This operation is repeated until the part is complete. The platform then rises to the surface, revealing the product. The par polymerisation.

The Polyjet (material jet) process is also based on the principle of photopolymerisation. The photosensitive material is deposited drop by drop on a support and then exposed to an ultraviolet beam which instantly cures the resin. The advantage of this process is that it can print multi-material and coloured parts.

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), also uses a laser beam, but this time a very powerful laser beam capable of rapidly raising the temperature of the material. The principle is therefore to heat in order to assemble the powder particles at very precise points and thus alloy them together. A new layer is then deposited and heated again to fuse with the previous one. This operation is repeated until the finished part is obtained. The most common material is polyamide (nylon) but glass powder or ceramics can also be used.


Three Dimensional Printing (3DP) uses fine drops of coloured glue to assemble fine particles of thin layers of composites spread on a platform. This platform is lowered as the layers are made until the final part is obtained.

The processes mentioned above are adapted and developed mainly for the printing of polymer parts. Nevertheless, additive metal manufacturing has been gained momentum in recent years and has undergone numerous technological developments. These advances allow more and more innovative manufacturing methods and generate a wider range of usable materials. Among the additive metal manufacturing processes we find mainly:

Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS), part of the 3D printing family called “powder bed fusion”. This method is based on the same principle as the SLS process, i.e. precise heating by means of a laser beam to sinter or fuse metal powder particles together and thus produce the final part layer by layer.

Direct Laser Additive Construction (DLAC): concentrated energy material deposition technology. It consists of feeding material in the form of metal powder or wire through the printer nozzle and immediately melting it at the outlet using a powerful heat source: in this case a laser beam (other technologies exist for which heating is provided by an electron beam – EBM – or plasma). This method allows direct printing of parts, unlike with the powder bed melting process.

Cold Spray: the aim is to coat a part by cold metallization. The metal powder particles are sprayed in a gas (nitrogen or helium) under pressure (approximately 50 bars) at very high speed (up to 1200m/s) onto the substrate. Upon impact, particle deformation ensures the quality of the deposit.

Stratoconception is a hybrid 3D printing process which breaks down the part to be produced into several layers. Each of the layers is created by some form of cutting (milling, laser cutting, wire sawing, etc.), which are then positioned using inserts, bridges or other nesting elements in order to be assembled and thus reconstitute the final part.

=> Various other technologies have been developed directly by some manufacturers. All these developments further distinguish the process categories already mentioned.

Most metals can be used in additive manufacturing. The most widespread are aluminium (often in the form of an alloy) for its lightness, and steel for its mechanical properties. Titanium, cobalt-chromium, gallium, superalloys (inconel type) and precious metals (gold, platinum and silver) are also widely used in this industry.
However, it is important to note that metallic powders are expensive, so 3D printing is not used in the manufacture of very large parts.

The field of 3D printing is a rapidly evolving one. It offers major advantages but also presents some limitations. The advantages include:

– The ability to manufacture parts with complex geometries without increasing costs. The manufacturing process whereby layers are added makes it possible to achieve precise part geometries more easily than by “traditional” manufacturing, sometimes even at a lower cost because less material is used.

– No specific tooling is required to create a product (as opposed to the tooling devices or moulds used in shapes manufacturing). The cost of a 3D printed part depends solely on the amount of material used, the time required to produce it and the subsequent processing operations.

– The ease of creating customised parts. As start-up costs are low, each production can be personalised simply by modifying the 3D digital model.

– Rapid prototyping at low cost. The rapidity of part manufacture greatly accelerates the “design cycle” (design, testing, improvement, modification, etc.).

– The wide range of usable materials. Although the most commonly-used materials are plastics, metals and composites are finding more and more industrial applications to meet ever more specific needs.

Nevertheless, 3D printing in manufacturing presents some limitations:

– For most 3D printing processes the physical properties of the products are not as good as those of the materials used.
However, selective metal melting by laser processes (DMLS) do in some cases produce parts with excellent mechanical properties.

– Additive manufacturing is limited by the number of products to be mass-produced. It cannot compete with other processes for very large production runs.

– The tolerance and precision of parts are limited. They vary according to the printing process, but the parts often require finishing operations to optimise characteristics, tolerances and surface finishes. 3D-printed parts are rarely ready for use when they come off the “printer”. The finishing operations required are usually the removal of the substrate (i.e. all the printed structures to anchor the part and/or make up for imbalance during printing), sanding, polishing, painting, etc.

=> 3D printing is therefore used in many industrial fields. It finds applications in many activity sectors such as: automotive (titanium brake calliper), aeronautics (lightening of structures), naval aviation (ship propellers), energy (gas turbine blades), medical (titanium implants), aerospace (telescopic aluminium mirror, satellite antenna support, rocket engine turbo pump), metal construction (steel bridge), watchmaking, jewellery or goldsmith’s trade, etc.

It is the additive metal fabrication that will most often require metallographic preparation.


In general, depending on the printing technology, process, development, transformation operations and different finishing treatments, the properties and microstructures of the materials contained in the part are influenced.
All these influences lead to metallographic quality controls such as: examinations of porosities, dimensioning, pull-out, structures and microstructures, searches for heterogeneities, search for and examination of inclusions and/or impurities, hardness tests, grain size controls, etc.
Obtaining an inspection surface requires a succession of operations, each as important as the next, regardless of the material. These steps are in the following order:

– The removal of the product to be examined (if necessary), called “CUTTING”.
– Standardisation of the geometry of the sample taken (if necessary), called “MOUNTING”.
– Improvement of the surface condition of this sample, called “POLISHING”.
– Characterisation of the sample: revealing the microstructure of the sample by an etching reagent (if necessary) called “METALLOGRAPHIC ETCHING” and microscopic observation (optical or electronic).

=> Each of these steps must be carried out rigorously, otherwise the following steps will not be possible.


The purpose of cutting is to remove a precise section of a product, in order to obtain a suitable surface for inspection, without altering the physico-chemical properties of the materials in question. In other words, it is essential to avoid heating or any deformation of the metal that could lead to strain hardening. Cutting is a fundamental step which conditions the further preparation and inspection of parts.

PRESI’s wide range of medium and large capacity cutting and micro-cutting machines can be adapted to any need with regard to cutting precision, sizing or quantity of products to be cut:

Mecatome T210

Price on request


Ref. 51270
Price on request
Each of the cutting machines in the range has its own customised consumables and accessories. The clamping system and choice of consumables are key factors in a successful metallographic cut.
=> Clamping, i.e. holding the workpiece, is essential. If the workpiece is not held properly, the cut can be detrimental to the cut-off wheel, the workpiece and the machine.


All cutting machines are used with a lubricating/cooling liquid composed of a mixture of water and anti-rust additive in order to obtain a clean cut without overheating. The additive also protects the sample and the machine from corrosion.

The choice cut-off wheel type depends on the properties of the material and especially its hardness. It is therefore necessary to match consumables to the make-up of the composite material to be cut (see Lab’Notes corresponding to the material for more information). Consumables are chosen according to the majority material (polymer, light metal or ceramic).

Meule Polymer materials Metallic materials Ceramic materials
Non-ferrous Ferrous
Micro-cutting UTW
S Ø180
S Ø180mm
S Ø180
LM / LM+
Medium-capacity cutting MNF
LM / LM+
High-capacity cutting MNF
LM / LM+
Table 1: Choosing the right cut-off wheel type
=> The choice of cut-off wheel type has to be adequate, in order to avoid cutting failure, or excessive cut-off wheel wear or even breakage.


Samples can be difficult to handle due to their complex shape, fragility or small size. Mounting makes them easier to handle by standardising their geometry and dimensions.
=> Achieving good-quality mounting is essential to protect fragile materials and also to achieve good preparation results for polishing and future analysis.

Before mounting, the specimen should be deburred with coarse abrasive paper, for example, to remove any cutting burrs. Cleaning with ethanol (in an ultrasonic tank for even greater efficiency) is also possible. This allows the resin to adhere as well as possible to the sample and thus limits shrinkage (space between the resin and the sample).

If shrinkage persists, it can lead to problems during polishing. Abrasive grains may become lodged in this space and then be released at a later stage, thus creating a risk of pollution for the sample and the polishing surface. In this case, cleaning with an ultrasonic cleaner between each step is recommended.

There are two mounting options:


He is to be preferred for edge inspection purposes or if the metallographic preparation is carried out in preparation for hardness testing. This option requires a hot-mounting machine.

Mecapress 3

Ref. 53500
Price on request
The machine required for hot-mounting is the Mecapress 3:
– Fully automatic hot-mounting press.
– Easy to use: memorisation, adjustment of processes and speed of execution make it a high-precision machine,
– The hot-mounting machine has 6 different mould diameters from 25.4-50mm.


One of the main advantages of this process is that it provides perfectly parallel faces.


He is to be preferred:
– If the parts to be examined are fragile/sensitive to pressure
– If they have a complex geometry such as a honeycomb structure.
– If a large number of parts are to be mounted in series.

The cold process can be used with:


Substantially improves quality, in particular by reducing shrinkage, optimising transparency and facilitating resin impregnation.


Ref. 53600
Price on request


Machine allowing vacuum impregnation of porous mounted materials using an epoxy resin.
Cold resins do not always provide a flat mounting “back” because of the meniscus of the liquid resin. Before any polishing operation, a brief step using abrasive paper will remove this meniscus. The important thing is to ensure that this operation renders the two sides of the mounting parallel.


To meet user needs, PRESI offers a full range of cold mounting moulds. The cold process has different mounting moulds with diameters from 20-50mm. These are divided into several types: optimised moulds called “KM2.0”, rubber, Teflon or polyethylene moulds. Cold mounting is also more flexible, hence the existence of rectangular moulds for more specific needs.
Résine d'enrobage Polymer materials Metallic materials Ceramic materials
Hot process Ø Hot epoxy
Cold process KM-U
Table 2: Choosing the right mounting resin type
* Suitable for very large series
Ceramic and polymer materials are brittle and are sensitive to heat and/or pressure. It is therefore not recommended to perform a hot mounting process with this type of material.


The last and crucial phase in the sample preparation process is polishing. The principle is simple, each step uses a finer abrasive than the previous one. The aim is to obtain a flat surface and to eliminate scratches and residual defects that would hinder the performance of metallographic control examinations such as microscopic analysis, hardness tests, microstructure or dimensional inspections.

PRESI offers a wide range of manual and automatic polishing machines, with a wide choice of accessories, to cover all needs, from pre-polishing to super-finishing and polishing of single or series samples.

The MINITECH range of manual polishers incorporates the most advanced technologies. User-friendly, reliable and robust, they provide a simple answer to all needs.
The MECATECH range of automatic polishers allows both manual and automatic polishing. With its advanced technologies, motor power from 750-1500 W, all the PRESI experience is concentrated in this very complete range. Whatever the sample number or size, MECATECH guarantees optimal polishing.


All the polishing ranges below are given for automatic sample preparation (for manual polishing: do not take into account the parameters at the top). They are the most commonly used and are given for information and advice.

All the first steps of each range are called “levelling” and consist of removing material quickly to level the surface of the sample (and resin). Those given below are standard and can therefore be modified as required.

Applied pressures vary according to sample size, but in general the following applies: 1daN per 10mm mounting diameter for the pre-polishing steps (ex: Ø40mm = 4 daN) then reduce force by 0.5daN at each polishing step with an abrasive suspension.

Range N°1 N°2 N°3 N°4 N°5
Material Polymer materials Steel and hard metals Soft metals Titanium Ceramic materials
Table N°3: Choice of polishing range

Range N°1

Support Suspension / lubricant Platen Speed (RPM) Head Speed (RPM) Rotation direction plate / head Time
1 SiC P600 Ø / Water 300 150 1’
2 TOP 9μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 4’
3 STA 3μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 3’
4 NT Al2O3 n°1 / Water 150 100 1’
Micrograph 1: PLA – Surface condition TOP 9μm lens x5
Micrograph 2: PLA – Surface condition STA 3μm lens x5
Micrograph 3: PLA – Surface condition NT Al2O3 N°1 lens x5

Range N°2

Support Suspension / lubricant Platen Speed (RPM) Head Speed (RPM) Rotation direction plate / head Time
1 SiC P320 Ø / Water 300 150 1’
2 TOP 9μm LDP / Reflex Lub 300 150 4’
3 RAM 3μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 2’
4 NT 1μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 1’
5 NT Al2O3 n°3 / Water 150 100 1’
Micrograph 4: Alloy of Cobalt-Chromium – Surface condition P320 lens x5
Micrograph 5: Alloy of Cobalt-Chromium – Surface condition TOP 9μm lens x5
Micrograph 6: Alloy of Cobalt-Chromium – Surface condition RAM 3μm lens x5
Micrograph 7: Alloy of Cobalt-Chromium – Surface condition NT 1μm lens x5

Range N°3

Support Suspension / Lubricant Plateau Speed (RPM) Head Speed (RPM) Rotation direction plate / head Time
1 SiC P320 Ø / Water 300 150 1’
2 SiC P120 Ø / Water 300 150 1’
3 RAM 3μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 3’
4 NT 1μm LDM / Reflex Lub 150 135 1’
5 SUPRA SPM / Water 150 100 1’
Micrograph 8: Aluminium alloy – Surface condition P1200 lens x5
Micrograph 9: Aluminium alloy – Surface condition RAM 3μm lens x5
Micrograph 10: Aluminium alloy – Surface condition NT 1μm lens x5
Micrograph 11: Aluminium alloy – Surface condition SUPRA SPM lens x5

Range N°4

Support Suspension / Lubricant Platen Speed (RPM) Head Speed (RPM) Rotation direction plate / head Time
1 SiC P320 Ø / Water 300 150 1’
2 TOP 9μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 5’
3 SUPRA SPM / Water 150 100 5’
Micrograph 12: Titanium alloy – Surface condition P320 lens x5
Micrograph 13: Titanium alloy – Surface condition TOP 9μm lens x5
Micrograph 14: Titanium alloy – Surface condition SUPRA SPM lens x5

Range N°5

Support Suspension / Lubricant Platen Speed (RPM) Head Speed (RPM) Rotation direction plate / head Time
1 Tissediam 40μm Ø / Water 300 150 2’
2 Tissediam 20μm Ø / Water 300 150 2’
3 TOP 9μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 5’
4 NWF+ 3μm LDP / Reflex Lub 150 135 2’
5 SUPRA SPM / Water 150 100 2’
All the polishing ranges listed above are standard and versatile ranges that can be modified according to the subtleties of the samples.
Moreover, they are not necessarily to be carried out in their entirety; observations will define needs (except for titanium samples for which all the steps of the range must be performed).
At the end of this preparation phase, the polished samples can be directly observed without metallographic etching.

Otherwise, metallographic etching allows differences in relief and/or colour to be made between the different components and so allows them to be observed. It is mainly used on metals.


All micrographs presented were created using the PRESI VIEW software:
Micrograph 15: Sintered steel polished to 3μm for lens x5 hardness testing
Micrograph 16: Polished stainless steel in the 1μm lens x50 state
Micrograph 17: Titanium alloys polished in the SPM lens x20 and x50 state
Micrograph 18: Titanium alloys polished in the SPM lens x20 and x50 state
Micrographic 19: Inconel polished in Al2O3 state N°3 lens x20
Micrograph 20: Cobalt-chromium alloy polished in the 1μm lens x50 state
Micrograph 21: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM lens x5 state
Micrograph 22: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM state and etched with Keller lens x5 reagent
Micrograph 23: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM lens x20 state
Micrograph 24: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM state and etched with Keller lens x20 reagent
Micrograph 25: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM lens x50 state
Micrograph 26: Polished aluminium alloy in SPM state and etched with Keller lens x20 reagent
Micrograph 27: PLA polymer polished in Al2O3 state N°1 lens x5
Micrograph 28: Polished PLA polymer in Al2O3 state N°1 lens x20